• The Riffle
  • Posts
  • FSRA Thematic Review on Client Classification

FSRA Thematic Review on Client Classification

Strengthening Client Classification: FSRA’s Review on Compliance Gaps, Key Challenges, and Required Actions for APs.

The Riffle

The FSRA’s thematic review assessed APs' compliance with client classification rules under COBS Chapter 2. Key gaps include mixing classification with AML/KYC, weak knowledge assessments, poor governance, and lack of ongoing monitoring. APs must conduct a gap analysis and address deficiencies.

Client Classification

  • Conflation with AML/KYC
    APs often mix client classification with AML/KYC due diligence, leading to improper classification. FSRA expects a distinct, well-documented classification process.

  • Inadequate Assessment of Net Assets
    APs must ensure accurate assessment and verification of net assets based on financial documents, asset valuations, and exclusions outlined in COBS 2.4.4 (b)(i).

  • Insufficient Knowledge and Experience Assessment
    Many APs rely on client self-assessment instead of conducting independent evaluations through direct interactions, financial history reviews, and open-ended questionnaires.

  • Reliance on External Classifications Without Gap Analysis
    Some branches rely on parent company classifications without verifying compliance with FSRA rules. A full gap analysis is required.

  • Weak Governance, Training, and Record Keeping
    Many APs lack proper governance structures, staff training, and record-keeping mechanisms, affecting compliance quality. FSRA mandates a second-line review process.

  • Lack of Ongoing Monitoring
    APs fail to periodically review client classifications. FSRA expects continuous monitoring and reclassification when client circumstances change.

  • Fund Managers and Unitholders Classification
    Fund managers must classify unitholders before admitting them to Exempt or Qualified Investor Funds, applying the same client classification standards as other APs.

Disclosure Requirements

  • APs must clearly disclose classification criteria and maintain transparency regarding classification decisions.

  • Notifications sent to clients about their classification status should be well-documented.

Regulatory Compliance

  • Gap Analysis – APs must assess their classification framework against FSRA findings and COBS rules.

  • Remediation – Implement improvements in processes, policies, training, and documentation.

  • Training – Staff must be trained to ensure proper client classification and adherence to regulatory requirements.

  • Monitoring – Establish a system for periodic reassessment of client classifications.

  • Segregation – Ensure clear separation between AML/KYC processes and client classification.

Next Steps

APs should immediately implement these recommendations to maintain compliance. FSRA will continue monitoring and may conduct further reviews to ensure effective remediation.

Read our detailed briefing document here:

FSRA Thematic Review on Client Classification-2.pdf97.86 KB • PDF File